When an “Ally” Starts Talking Like a Landlord...

Why “Buy Our Jets” Is Starting to Sound Like a Threat

Here’s a line Canadians should never get used to hearing…

“Buy our weapons… or we’ll just operate our military in your country more.”

That’s not partnership.
That’s leverage.

And it didn’t come from a random cable pundit. It came straight from the U.S. ambassador to Canada.

The message was blunt…
If Canada doesn’t stick with the American-made F-35 program beyond the 16 jets currently ordered, the U.S. says the rules of NORAD would have to “change.”

Translated out of diplomatic fog?
More U.S. jets. More U.S. patrols. More U.S. military activity over Canada — without asking.

That’s one step shy of saying, “We’ll handle it for you.”

---

Why the Pressure Is Suddenly This Loud

Canada has another option on the table.

Sweden’s Saab has offered a package centered on the Gripen that includes:

• 72 fighter jets

• 6 Global Eye surveillance aircraft

• 12,600 Canadian jobs

• Manufacturing in Canada

• Maintenance in Canada

• Full access to the technology — no remote choke collar

That’s not just a defense decision.
That’s industrial policy.

Military procurement is one of the rare moments when a government can choose where billions land. And the U.S. clearly doesn’t want that money landing anywhere but home.

So the tone shifts… fast.

---

“Trust Us” From the Country Holding the Kill Switch

This is where the Denmark story matters.

Denmark bought the F-35.
Now it’s their only operational fighter jet.

During U.S. threats over Greenland, Denmark’s own defense officials admitted something chilling:
If the U.S. ever chose to, it could cripple Denmark’s air force simply by cutting parts, software, or support.

Their jets are reportedly down for repairs about half the time.
And the supply chain? Not Danish. Not European. American.

That’s not sovereignty.
That’s renting your own defense system.

Imagine buying a fire truck where the seller keeps the keys — and reminds you of that fact whenever you disagree.

---

This Isn’t About Jets. It’s About Control.

No one’s arguing Canada shouldn’t defend North America.
That’s not the issue.

The issue is this logic:

“If you don’t buy from us, we’ll treat your choices as a security risk — and act accordingly.”

That’s how empires talk.
Not allies.

Plenty of NATO countries fly non-U.S. aircraft.
Only Canada is being told its shopping list could justify foreign military “intervention.”

That should set off every alarm we have.

---

The Bigger Picture Canadians Can’t Ignore

If Canada builds an air force that depends entirely on another country’s permission to function, we’re not defending ourselves.

We’re leasing autonomy.

And once you accept that logic, the next demands get easier:

• Spend here

• Buy this

• Align always

• Push back never

That’s how a middle power quietly becomes a managed territory.

---

Bottom Line

This isn’t anti-American.
It’s pro-Canadian.

Friends don’t threaten each other with “or else.”
Partners don’t hint they’ll operate freely inside your borders if you don’t open your wallet.

Canada gets to decide how it defends itself — without a gun on the table.

Anything less isn’t an alliance.
It’s a pressure contract.

---

Source credit…

Based on reporting from CBC News and a public interview given by the U.S. ambassador to Canada. Facts retained; wording rebuilt from scratch.

---

Canada Strong Movement… House Rule & Disclosure

Canada Strong exists to defend Canadian sovereignty, democratic norms, and economic independence… without imported talking points or borrowed outrage.

House rule… Facts and good-faith discussion are welcome. I use AI tools to help turn my spoken drafts into clear writing. I’m 73, my hands shake, and I type with two fingers… so I speak first, then edit.

The ideas, positions, and final message are mine.

---

💌 If you enjoyed this, subscribe at GeezerWise.com to get future Unlearn letters straight to your inbox: www.geezerwise.com/subscribe ✌️

#CanadaStrongMovement #CanadaStrong