5 Comments
User's avatar
Kevin 🇨🇦's avatar

Good article. There is absolutely no use in negotiating against ourselves and capitulating to try to get a so-called deal. Diversification is a much better strategy.

Graydon Sheppard's avatar

Yes but... why is it taking so long to rid ourselves of inter provincial trade barriers? We have been told so often that doing so will increase our prosperity enormously.

Fred Ferguson (GeezerWise)'s avatar

Partly because every province protects something.

Quebec protects language and procurement rules.

Western provinces protect certain industries.

Atlantic provinces protect local markets.

Ontario protects its own regulations.

Everyone agrees interprovincial barriers are a problem until removing one affects a local interest group, industry, union, profession, or government revenue stream.

The good news is that U.S. trade uncertainty has finally created pressure to deal with it. Progress is happening, but after decades of building different provincial rules, it won't be fixed overnight.

Canada has spent years acting like 13 separate markets.

We're now discovering we need to behave more like one country.

Earl Baum's avatar

I agree with your analysis and conclusions across the board

Anyone who actually knows how tariffs work knows that it’s the importers and customers who pay the bill - I as an American pay for those with my purchases. Not Canada (or Mexico or China…)

The leverage is *supposed* to be that those increases in internal costs (because tariffs) reduce sales and force concessions from the exporters

As it happens, particularly in this case, the exporters - Canada again in this case - can simply look for other customers

I applaud Canada for being the adult in the room and not responding to the thrashings of a petulant toddler

Bev's avatar

Really really wish our national media would report this. The only progressive news comes from Canada s National Observer and small local voices.