The Alberta Wedge... How You Break a Country Without Firing a Shot

This isn’t about independence... it’s about instability

You don’t invade a modern country with tanks anymore.

You do it with suggestions, referendums, and a few well-placed friends who swear they’re just “asking questions.”

That’s the move being floated right now with Alberta.

Not loudly.
Not officially.
Quietly—like slipping a crowbar into a doorframe and waiting to hear the wood crack.

Here’s what matters.

After Canada embarrassed Trump on the world stage—standing up for democratic norms while he played the international clown—the retaliation didn’t come as tariffs or threats.

It came as “what if Alberta…”

Not “what if Canada.”
Not “what if we negotiate.”
Just Alberta.

That’s not an accident. That’s strategy.

---

This Isn’t About Separatists Winning

There’s a dangerous misunderstanding floating around:
“That movement is tiny. It’ll never pass.”

It doesn’t need to.

The goal isn’t success.
The goal is plausible chaos.

You don’t need a majority—just enough noise to claim there’s “a crisis,” “a dispute,” or “people asking for help.” That’s how you justify interference without ever admitting you planned it.

Think of it like loosening the bolts on a bridge.
You don’t drive the truck across.
You just wait for traffic.

---

The $500 Million Question Nobody Wants to Ask

There’s talk—persistent, ugly talk—of a massive war chest tied to Alberta separatist groups. Hundreds of millions. Real money.

If that number were linked to China or Iran, we’d already have hearings, wall-to-wall coverage, and a dozen panels shouting “foreign interference.”

But because the fingerprints point south?

Crickets.

Funny how that works.

---

Why Alberta? Because It’s the Pressure Point

Alberta isn’t weak.
It’s proud, stubborn, fiercely Canadian—and that’s exactly why it’s being targeted.

If you can create the illusion that Alberta is restless, angry, or “on the brink,” you get leverage over the whole country.

It’s the same logic as threatening the breaker panel instead of the lights.

And make no mistake: this isn’t grassroots patriotism.
It’s imported grievance politics—rage with an accent.

---

The Referendum Shell Game

Here’s the part that should set off alarms:

• A legitimate, Canada-affirming referendum existed.

• It showed Albertans wanted to stay.

• It got shelved.

• The rules were quietly rewritten.

• A new, constitutionally shaky question gets pushed instead.

That’s not democracy.
That’s stage management.

And it doesn’t matter if it fails. Once the question exists, the talking point exists.

That’s the whole trick.

---

Media Silence Is the Second Threat

This should be front-page news.
Instead, it’s buried—or ignored entirely.

We hear endless talk about “foreign meddling,” just never when the source is the United States.

Yet no other country is openly flirting with the idea of fracturing Canada.

That double standard isn’t accidental. It’s cowardice.

---

This Is Bigger Than Alberta

Canada isn’t being targeted because we’re weak.
We’re being targeted because we’re inconvenient.

A functioning democracy on the border—one that believes in law, pluralism, and collective responsibility—is a bad example for authoritarian politics.

You don’t conquer that with bombs.
You destabilize it and let it rot on camera.

---

Bottom Line

This isn’t panic talk.
It’s pattern recognition.

You don’t wait for the house to burn down before checking who left the gas on.

Canada needs to name this for what it is, investigate it like we would any foreign interference, and stop pretending that friendly flags can’t hide hostile intent.

Because if Alberta ever becomes “the excuse,” the damage is already done.

---

Source note:
This piece was informed by watching and analyzing commentary from Midas Canada / Charlie Angus. Facts retained. Language, structure, and framing rebuilt from scratch.

---

Canada Strong Movement… House Rule & Disclosure

Canada Strong exists to defend Canadian sovereignty, democratic norms, and economic independence… without imported talking points or borrowed outrage.

House rule… Facts and good-faith discussion are welcome. I use AI tools to help turn my spoken drafts into clear writing. I’m 73, my hands shake, and I type with two fingers… so I speak first, then edit.

The ideas, positions, and final message are mine.

---

💌 If you enjoyed this, subscribe at GeezerWise.com to get future Unlearn letters straight to your inbox: www.geezerwise.com/subscribe ✌️

#CanadaStrongMovement #CanadaStrong