Mark Carney Could Call an Election Tomorrow. So Why Isn’t He?
Polls show Liberals would likely win a comfortable majority. Instead, they’re fighting for one seat at a time while Parliament hangs by a thread. That isn’t weakness. It’s a different kind of gamble.
Politics usually rewards the person who swings hardest when the odds are in their favour.
That’s why what’s happening in Ottawa feels so unusual.
If the polls are even close to being right, Mark Carney could probably ask Canadians for a new mandate today and walk away with a majority government.
Instead, he’s doing the opposite.
He’s letting three by-elections decide whether his minority government survives another day.
On the surface, that sounds risky.
Underneath, it may be one of the smartest political calculations we’ve seen in years.
Right now, the Liberals are balanced on a knife edge.
With resignations and seat changes, they’re expected to slip from 171 seats to 170.
That leaves them needing just one victory in the August 31 by-elections to keep control of Parliament.
Two of those ridings have traditionally leaned Liberal.
The third is where things get interesting.
Chicoutimi, Quebec, was won by the Conservatives last time by fewer than 2,000 votes.
In a province where leadership matters as much as party labels, Quebec could once again end up deciding Canada’s political direction.
That’s where the numbers become impossible to ignore.
National polling has the Liberals sitting around the low-40-percent range, comfortably ahead of the Conservatives.
Seat projections suggest that support would translate into roughly 187 seats… more than enough for a majority government.
Even more striking is Mark Carney’s personal popularity.
His national approval sits well above his political rivals, and in Quebec his approval climbs into territory most politicians can only dream about.
Pierre Poilievre, meanwhile, faces deeply negative numbers in the province, making it difficult for Conservatives to expand where they badly need seats.
Normally, that would trigger the oldest move in politics.
Call the election.
Take the majority.
Lock in four years.
Instead, Carney appears to be betting that governing responsibly matters more than looking opportunistic.
Whether you agree with that approach or not, it’s a sharp contrast to the political playbook Canadians have grown used to.
There’s another sign that Canada’s political map is quietly shifting.
Several MPs have left their seats for other roles, creating this string of by-elections.
At the same time, a handful of opposition MPs have crossed the floor to join the Liberals.
Floor crossings don’t happen every day.
When politicians decide their future is brighter wearing another party’s colours, they’re sending a message about where they think momentum is heading.
That doesn’t mean the Conservatives are finished.
Far from it.
They remain the Official Opposition and still hold strong support in many parts of Western Canada.
But politics isn’t won by dominating one region.
Governments are built by winning where the population is concentrated… and that continues to make Ontario, British Columbia and especially Quebec the real battlegrounds.
Quebec has always played politics differently.
Many voters there don’t simply vote for the party they like best.
They often vote strategically, choosing the candidate they believe can best shape the outcome they want.
Every close race is more important than it first appears.
One riding can change the arithmetic in Parliament.
One seat can determine whether legislation survives.
One by-election can change the conversation heading into the fall.
The strange part is that none of this has to happen.
If the current polling reflects where Canadians truly stand, a general election could settle the question once and for all.
Instead, Ottawa continues operating with the uncertainty that comes with minority government.
Supporters will call that restraint.
Critics will call it hesitation.
History will decide which one it was.
For now, Canadians are watching a government that seems capable of winning a majority but is choosing to govern one vote at a time.
That’s not the normal way politics works.
Which may be exactly the point.
The Recap…
The Liberals could probably win a majority election today.
Instead, they’re risking everything on three by-elections and a one-seat margin.
Most politicians would grab the power while they could.
Mark Carney seems to be betting that patience will earn something more valuable than another victory.
The Gut-Punch…
Sometimes the biggest political gamble isn’t calling an election.
It’s refusing to call one when everyone expects you to.
Source credit:
Research compiled from current Canadian polling, federal by-election schedules, parliamentary seat counts, public approval surveys, and recent political reporting on the August 2026 federal by-elections and leadership trends.
If you enjoy thoughtful conversations, Canadian stories, and the occasional smart-ass observation about the world we’re living in, you’re in the right place.
Subscribe free and get new stories, insights, and observations delivered directly to your inbox.
No paywall.
No spam.
No nonsense.
Leave anytime with a single click.
I promise not to take it personally.
If we look back to Carney's first election last spring (2025), that event was a colossal 1-2 month distraction, when we had tons of real-world things that needed attention (side note, Carney was still actually DOING all of that work, including European visits and economic pivots, WHILE campaigning!). But it was still a massive distraction.
That would be the same situation now, if we were to go to the polls - and possibly with unintended consequences. You would see Trump's minions ratcheting up all kinds of rhetoric that would be trying to sway things their way. We would be wasting time the we should be spending on economic pivots and what not (we just locked in a trade investment deal with UAE in a record 47 days -- fastest deal the UAE has ever made, and it begs the question "why now, why did they do that, with all the turmoil happening in their neck of the woods?")
I think your Quebec speculation is very interesting: And I do wonder what "strategically" will mean in their case. At present, Bombardier (and Quebec) have the biggest economic wins happening, largely due to Carney's efforts (and the fact Bombardier just happens to be located there) -- GlobalEye contracts, Gripen contracts on the horizon, Saudi Arabia ordering potentially 90-some Bombardier executive jets -- and former Bombardier facility Airbus (making the old C-Series planes) landing major order from Asia Airways -- well, the speculation now is how will the aviation industry there actually BUILD all of this (major expansion of capacity needed? Hmm, maybe Ontario could "repurpose" various mothballed auto factories . . . .).
So, how would this play out in Quebec??
The other side note: Carney likely has a "majority" in the House, even if not a literal one. Last time I looked, several other parties have vacancies in their lineup, too (Conservatives, being of particular interest). So is it even likely that Carney's 'minority' government could actually be defeated, if a confidence vote was called today? Answer: No -- even IF all opposition parties voted together, they wouldn't have enough votes.
The other thing: Carney has (amazingly) unprecedented good-will with most Canadian citizens (hmm, maybe excluding that "20%" from your previous posting yesterday - die-hard right-leaning conservatives, I guess??). So he has the "will of the people" behind him right now. While I'm sure he would capture a landslide majority, nobody wants an election right now when they are panicking about all of the economic turmoil -- that's what they want the government focused on. So he would lose a big piece of goodwill if he just did the usual political manipulation. He has no serious opposition - so why give them a microphone? Canadians want him to "Carney on" for now.
It's probably the sensible thing to do. An election could be a major distraction a d I don't think Carney wants to be seen to be playing politics.