Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hans Boserup, Dr.jur. 🇩🇰's avatar

You’re pointing at something real — but I’d frame it slightly differently.

It’s rarely “one man” who turns a country against itself.

What happens instead is that one figure exposes and accelerates divisions that were already there.

The U.S. didn’t suddenly become polarized.

It had:

long-standing institutional mistrust

media fragmentation

economic divergence between regions and classes

and a political culture increasingly built on identity rather than compromise

A strong political figure doesn’t create that from scratch —

but he can weaponize it, simplify it, and make it visible.

That’s the key shift.

What used to be underlying tension becomes daily political reality.

And once that happens, the system starts feeding itself:

outrage drives attention

attention drives media incentives

media incentives deepen division

So the question isn’t really who caused it —

but why the system was so ready for it.

That’s the more uncomfortable — and more important — answer.

Alexis 🇨🇦's avatar

“As of early 2026, roughly 63% to 64% of Canadians hold an unfavourable view of the United States, with some data suggesting up to 69% feel the U.S. is a "potential threat" or requires a cautious approach. This historically high level of negativity is driven by trade disputes, with 55% of Canadians in recent polling identifying the U.S. as a top threat to their national security, even surpassing Russia and China.”

Pew Research Center

25 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?