Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hans Boserup, Dr.jur. 🇩🇰's avatar

You’re pointing at something real — but I’d frame it slightly differently.

It’s rarely “one man” who turns a country against itself.

What happens instead is that one figure exposes and accelerates divisions that were already there.

The U.S. didn’t suddenly become polarized.

It had:

long-standing institutional mistrust

media fragmentation

economic divergence between regions and classes

and a political culture increasingly built on identity rather than compromise

A strong political figure doesn’t create that from scratch —

but he can weaponize it, simplify it, and make it visible.

That’s the key shift.

What used to be underlying tension becomes daily political reality.

And once that happens, the system starts feeding itself:

outrage drives attention

attention drives media incentives

media incentives deepen division

So the question isn’t really who caused it —

but why the system was so ready for it.

That’s the more uncomfortable — and more important — answer.

Ron Murphy's avatar

It really doesn't matter what the narrative or question is, you will always get around 20% of the population to accept or reject it.. The world is flat, there will be a zombie apocalypse, zombies exist, aliens walk amongst us, vaccines are necessary, you should use a seat belt while driving, etc.... pose this as fact, an sure enough 20% will agree or disagree.

With an education level of basically grade 5 for roughly 54% of Americans, I'm surprised that the percentage is just 20%.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?