9 Comments
User's avatar
Patsy Rideout's avatar

Thank you, you always make "sense" out of "nonsense" :)

Kevin 🇨🇦's avatar

I believe there is an error in your assessment of the stats. According to Trump, slower growth, rising inflation, lower consumer spending and lower savings rates = US winning more than ever! Lol.

Fred Ferguson (GeezerWise)'s avatar

When reality and narrative collide, narrative usually tweets first.

Jim Veinot's avatar

When interest rates stay high, the cost of the national debt stays high. when that national debt is 120% of GDP and GDP is decreasing, the percent is increasing. When foreign nationals are selling off bonds, The U.S. is in a cash crunch. They need to issue new bonds at higher rates, which increases liability. This means the debt-equity ratio is increasing. See where I'm going? As I've mentioned before, the U.S. needs tariffs to help pay down the debt. A lot of the debt came from funneling tax credits to billionaires. The billionaires will own the assets while the country owes the debt. This is somewhat of a Faustian bargain.

Fred Ferguson (GeezerWise)'s avatar

Tariffs won’t pay down a multi-trillion debt.

That math doesn’t exist.

Jim Veinot's avatar

Thumper may not understand that. Perhaps 10% of all imports will pay the interest? While the real purpose of tariffs may be to onshore industry, one wonders why it’s believed that anyone outside of the U.S. would buy product. Also the cost of onshoring is prohibitive. I still see a downward economic spiral.

Gail McDonald's avatar

Excellent article again. The one thing I don't remember from way back when like before I was born, was how it was determined by the world that we were going to use the US dollar as the currency for the world.

Secondly, how did it evolve that the US, who did not step up and enter into World War II until after Japan bombed them, became the B- all and and end-all of the say on what the world is doing. I realize that Trump has taken it to an extreme, but in my memory, it seems that every American president all of a sudden determines if they are going to war against a country or another country can't do something.

Who do you think started this and somewhat importantly was it the GOP or the Democrats that was the main force behind it?

That these questions are not directly related to the article, but they are related to how rump and his party thinks they are in charge of the world. So in their view, everybody is supposed to jump to their bidding, and now that we as Canadians and other countries are not doing that Grump is trying to punish everyone with these tariffs.

Do I have this right?

Fred Ferguson (GeezerWise)'s avatar

After WWII the U.S. was the only major economy left standing, so the world anchored the financial system to the U.S. dollar. That gave them enormous influence.

And it wasn’t GOP vs Democrats... both parties built and maintained U.S. global leadership for 70+ years.

What’s changing now is tone and tactics. Tariffs on allies and “America first” pressure are pushing other countries (including Canada) to diversify.

So yes... you’re reading the situation pretty accurately.

Gail McDonald's avatar

Thank you Fred. It makes complete sense - I should have figured this out in my own. My family talked about restrictions during the war, as farm families what they gave up so they could provide for the troops, for example.

Canada was still in its infancy then, and part of the UK.

It's all piece of our beautiful country 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦