Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Grant Rowson's avatar

Good summary, as always, Fred.

This hasn't quite happened States-side yet, but I would think that the Canadian position (aligning both with Carney's AI framework and his electrical grid expansion) would be that for a "permit" (or at least a feasibility plan) for any data centre or cryptocurrency venture, etc., etc. would be to outline HOW it will self-generate all/most of its power needs. So, are they building wind turbines? Solar panels? Modular Nuclear Reactors?

And then secondarily, how are they handling the cooling problem (meaning, not consuming all water that might be needed for other just-as-important purposes (like farming, drinking, etc.). How about community initiatives where the "Heat gets Sunk" somehow, to then be drawn out in winter to heat local towns/buildings? AKA, recycle the heat somehow? So with this, the water becomes more like a contained radiator system, rather than a constant intake/discharge.

There's also a 3rd concern, being 24/7 "noise pollution." Not sure what to do about that one.

Anyway, we're seeing great success in our military procurement, with insistence on economic benefit to Canada (the USA being the big holdout - but I'm seeing that being a crucial negotiating element within the CUSMA discussions). So, why can't we insist on something similar here for data centres —meaning environmentally (more) friendly cogeneration of power? Modular nuclear reactors, solar, wind, etc.

Not sure how ROC (Rest of Canada) can enforce that upon Alberta (here we go again, "Ottawa dictating how we should do things" . . . . ).

But really, any such proposal for a data centre should address at least these three aspects.

Jim Veinot's avatar

Alberta's position is predicated on the belief, now possible, that it can generate the electricity needed, profitably, with fossil fuel powered systems. This is a multiple win for the Power Province and all we have to do is hold our nose regarding the climate change effect. Apparently we as a nation are willing to do so in the short term to provide revenue to build for the long term. It may be a necessary gamble to fund the creation of Fortress Canada.

23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?